« Ghostbusters II Hidden Cameos | Spook Central's Ghostbusters 25th Anniversary Prize Giveaway Winner's List » |
Ghostbusters Home Video Comments
3 comments
I have the GB Blu-Ray, and from what I can tell, the 1999 DVD footage was used as an image source for the higher res Blu-Ray images…as Slimer has no green blob lighting from the 2005 DVD scene of his Sedgwick capture.
RE: The still image galleries… it’s a long and regretful story as to why some features (especially still galleries) are on original SD releases but never make it over to Blu-ray. Not speaking specifically to GB since I don’t know the story behind why some features were excluded but I’m working on another BD project right now where absolutely nothing was archived after the initial SD release and it’s been a beast trying to recreate, still for still, a gallery of thousands of images for the Blu-ray. Luckily we have the time and the budget to allow for such an undertaking (and are cleaning up and including the higher resolution stills) however in some cases, none of those luxuries exist.
It’s a goofy technical explanation that I’ll spare you of but you essentially can’t take exactly what was on an SD release in terms of still galleries and just put it on a Blu-ray as is. Not just because BD menus and still galleries are programmed and different formats but because the original material would only fill about 25% of your TV screen.
Anyway… I’m ranting. Hopefully the sales on the initial release will be through the roof and Sony will be motivated to get cracking on a super awesome special makes the Blade Runner collection look tiny collector’s set.
And if they do… they know who to call… ahem… anyway, back to work.
Troy
I appreciate the in-depth comment. I know that they simply couldn’t transfer them “as is” from the DVD to the Blu-Ray. That’s a given. I alluded to that in my post when I said that “the Blu-Ray would have given Sony the chance to […] have gone back to the original photographic sources, rescanned them in at higher resolutions, and shown everything full screen and flat-on, taking full advantage of the widescreen aspect ratio and higher resolution that Blu-Ray provides.
Obviously that takes time and money, like you said.
Sony has the money, and with it being a “special 25th anniversary release", there should have been a decent budget to do the disc as something special and fitting with the event.
They certainly had the time as they did the transfer a year or two ago, and pushed the release back from October 2008 to June 2009.
Looking over all of the pictures they added to Ghostbusters.com, I’m quite confident that they have all of the original photographic sources, and know where most (if not all) of them are.
So I still think Sony dropped the ball big time, but you do make a compelling argument.
One other thing I’m curious about: all of the SD video from the DVD was transferred over to the Blu-Ray. As I don’t have the Blu-Ray, I’ve have not seen how the original SD material is presented, but I have to believe that it’s shown to the full height of the wide screen (not counting the 4:3 letterboxed material which would now be windowboxed, I guess). So if they could do it with 4:3 SD video, why couldn’t they do it with the 4:3 SD stills? (Not that I think they should have done that - rescanning from the original sources is better - I’m just curious.)